Skip to main content
Santa Clara County Civic Gallery Board of Supervisors agenda intelligence

Matter SCC-128889

Consider recommendations relating to the Surveillance Use Policy for Data Extraction and Examination Forensic Tools and Software.

Legal & Litigation Board of Supervisors
3 Documents on file 519 KB · 3 extracted · 3 AI summaries
File
SCC-128889
Type
Unknown
Status
Unknown
Requester
Unknown
Introduced
Unknown
Last synced
16 Jul 2026 · 05:45

The papers

01 166 KB

Report Printout

166 KB Extracted AI Summary
file Unknown sha c402f019dcbc source Open source document ↗
Generated summary AI-assisted

The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.

This document is a report from the Office of the Public Defender regarding an updated Surveillance Use Policy for data extraction and examination forensic tools and software. It recommends that the Board of Supervisors consider adopting findings that the benefits of the surveillance technology outweigh the costs and approve the revised policy, which has been reviewed for legality. The revised policy removes vendor-specific language, allowing flexibility in vendor selection while maintaining existing requirements. The report outlines the positive impacts on clients, particularly youth and seniors, and emphasizes the importance of modern technology for effective legal representation.

Key points
  • The report is from the Office of the Public Defender to the Board of Supervisors.
  • It discusses an updated Surveillance Use Policy for data extraction and examination forensic tools.
  • The recommended action includes adopting findings that the benefits of the technology outweigh the costs.
  • The revised policy eliminates vendor-specific language to allow for flexibility in vendor selection.
  • There are no fiscal implications associated with the revised policy.
  • The policy aims to improve legal representation for clients, including youth and seniors.
  • The use of technology is subject to judicial authorization or consent from device owners.
Limitations
  • The document appears to be a draft as it includes a placeholder for the date and lacks finalized formatting.
  • The fiscal implications section states there are none, but does not provide specific details.
  • The document references attachments that are not included in the text.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

Extracted text preview · 5,953 chars
County of Santa Clara Office of the Public Defender 128889 DATE: June 23, 2026 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Damon J. Silver, Public Defender SUBJECT: Updated Surveillance Use Policy (Data Extraction and Examination Forensic Tools and Software) RECOMMENDED ACTION Consider recommendations relating to the Surveillance Use Policy for Data Extraction and Examination Forensic Tools and Software. Possible action: a. Adopt finding that the benefits of the surveillance technology outweigh the costs pursuant to Section A40-4 of the Santa Clara County Ordinance Code. b. Approve Revised Surveillance Use Policy for the Office of the Public Defender data extraction and examination forensic tools and software, that has been reviewed and approved by County Counsel as to form and legality. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS There are no fiscal implications associated with the approval of this revised Surveillance Use Policy. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION The existing Surveillance Use Policy (SUP) for data extraction and examination equipment was approved by the Board of Supervisors on January 29, 2019 (Item No. 21). The revised SUP eliminates references to a specific vendor of data extraction and examination...
02 214 KB

Office of the Public Defender - Data Extraction and Examination Forensic Tools and Software (June 2026)

214 KB Extracted AI Summary
file Unknown sha 09176e465cec source Open source document ↗
Generated summary AI-assisted

The document outlines the Surveillance Use Policy for the Santa Clara County Office of the Public Defender and Alternate Defender regarding the use of Data Extraction and Examination Forensic Tools and Software. It details the purpose, authorized uses, data collection, access, protection, retention, public access, third-party data-sharing, training, and oversight related to the forensic tools. The tools are to be used solely by trained staff for case-related purposes, with strict guidelines on data handling and sharing.

Key points
  • The policy allows the use of forensic tools to extract and analyze data from digital devices related to criminal investigations.
  • Only trained staff may use these tools, and they must do so within the scope of their employment and with proper authorization.
  • Data collected may include personal and sensitive information, and its access is restricted to authorized personnel.
  • The policy mandates secure storage and protection of collected data, with specific retention guidelines.
  • Public access to the data is limited, and third-party sharing is restricted without client consent or court order.
  • Training on the use of these tools is provided, and compliance with the policy is overseen by executive management.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

Extracted text preview · 8,395 chars
County of Santa Clara Office of the Public Defender/Alternate Defender Surveillance Use Policy Data Extraction and Examination Forensic Tools and Software 1. Purpose The Santa Clara County Offices of the Public and Alternate Defender (PDO/ADO) represent the indigent accused in criminal and civil proceedings. As part of that representation, it shall be permissible to utilize a variety of Data Extraction and Examination Forensic Tools and Software to extract, process, and analyze data from various types of digital devices, including computers, cellular phones, tablets, thumb drives, audio equipment, and video equipment, associated with a specific investigation of criminal activity. Data Extraction and Examination Forensic Tools and Software consist of computer software (installed on a high-speed computer) as well as computer cables or dongles, to connect a high- speed computer to PDO/ADO clients’ and/or witnesses’ digital devices. This equipment is a tool for the rapid forensic extraction of data contained on a digital device (e.g., tablets and cell phones) and efficient analysis of that data. Once data is extracted from a digital device, it is preserved in a forensically sound,...
03 139 KB

Office of the Public Defender - Data Extraction Examination Forensic (June 2026 redline compare to Jan. 2019)

139 KB Extracted AI Summary
file Unknown sha b625acc15651 source Open source document ↗
Generated summary AI-assisted

The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.

The document outlines the Surveillance Use Policy for the Santa Clara County Office of the Public Defender and Alternate Defender regarding the use of Data Extraction and Examination Equipment, specifically forensic tools and software. It details the purpose, authorized uses, data collection, access, protection, retention, public access, third-party data-sharing, training, and oversight related to the equipment. The policy emphasizes that the equipment is to be used only by trained staff for case-related purposes and under legal authorization, with strict guidelines on data handling and sharing.

Key points
  • The policy allows the use of Data Extraction and Examination Equipment to extract and analyze data from digital devices related to criminal investigations.
  • Only trained staff may use the equipment for specific case investigations, with judicial authorization or client consent required.
  • Data collected may include personal and sensitive information, and access is limited to authorized personnel.
  • Data retention policies vary based on the nature of the case, with files retained for different durations depending on the case outcome.
  • Public access to the data is restricted unless used in court or provided to the client.
  • Data sharing with third parties is limited and requires client consent or is part of legal proceedings.
  • Training on the equipment is provided to staff, and compliance with the policy is overseen by executive management.
Limitations
  • The document appears to be a draft, as indicated by the presence of placeholder text and formatting issues.
  • Specific dates and details regarding the implementation of the policy are not provided.
  • There are unresolved placeholders in the text that affect the completeness of the summary.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

Extracted text preview · 9,957 chars
County of Santa Clara Office of the Public Defender/Alternate Defender Surveillance Use Policy Data Extraction and Examination EquipmentForensic Tools and Software 1. Purpose The Santa Clara County Offices of the Public and Alternate Defender (PDO/ADO) represent the indigent accused in criminal and civil proceedings. As part of that representation, it shall be permissible forto utilize a variety of Data Extraction and Examination Equipment to be usedForensic Tools and Software to extract, process, and analyze data from various types of digital devices, including computers, cellular phones, tablets, thumb drives, audio equipment, and video equipment, associated with a specific investigation of a criminal activity. Data Extraction and Examination Equipment, which consistsForensic Tools and Software consist of computer software and (installed on a high-speed computer) as well as computer cables, or dongles, to connect a high-speed computer to PDO/ADO clients’ and/or witnesses’ digital devices. This equipment is a tool for the rapid forensic extraction of data contained on mobile electronic devicesa digital device (e.g., tablets and cell phones) and efficient analysis of that data....