This document outlines the revised budget recommendations for the Office of the District Attorney for Fiscal Year 2026-2027. It includes proposed staffing adjustments, funding transfers, and expenditure reductions aimed at maintaining budget neutrality without impacting services or staffing levels. Key actions include the deletion of various positions, the addition of a new Assistant to the District Attorney position, and transfers of funds from special accounts to the General Fund. The recommendations are set for final consideration on June 18, 2026.
Key points
The County Executive recommends revisions to the budget for the Office of the District Attorney.
Proposed actions include rescinding the deletion of 16 positions and adding one Senior Communications Officer position.
A total of 23 positions will be deleted, and one unclassified Assistant to the District Attorney position will be added.
Transfers of $500,000 in ongoing and one-time funding from special funds to the General Fund are proposed.
The recommendations aim to be budget neutral with no net impact on the General Fund.
The document includes specific details about position changes and funding adjustments.
Limitations
The document does not provide specific dates for all actions beyond June 16, 2026.
Some placeholders and unfilled options are present, affecting the completeness of the summary.
Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.
Extracted text preview · 8,503 chars
County of Santa Clara Office of the County Executive 129437 DATE: June 16, 2026 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: James R. Williams, County Executive SUBJECT: Revised County Executive Recommended Budget for Office of the District Attorney RECOMMENDED ACTION Consider the County Executive's Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Revised Recommendations for the Office of the District Attorney. Possible action: a. Rescind proposed deletion of 16 positions in various classifications and proposed addition of one Senior Communications Officer position in the "Realign Staffing to FY 2021-2022 Levels" proposal in the Office of the District Attorney. b. Delete 23 positions in various classifications in the Office of the District Attorney. c. Add one unclassified Assistant to the District Attorney position and transfer $221,555 in one-time funding from the Asset Forfeiture Proceeds Fund for the term-limited position in the Office of the District Attorney. Position shall expire at 11:59 p.m., on June 30, 2027. d. Transfer $500,000 in ongoing funding from the Consumer Fraud Trust Fund to the General Fund in the Office of the District Attorney. e. Transfer $500,000 in one-time funding from the Attorney General...
The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.
Karen Lee submitted a written public comment regarding item number 42 related to the Office of the District Attorney for the June 16, 2026 Board of Supervisors Budget Hearing. She expresses concern over proposed layoffs and budget cuts affecting the Office, particularly the impact on paralegals and the potential delays in the court system. Lee urges the Board to consider the original budget recommendation to avoid layoffs.
Key points
Karen Lee is a paralegal with the Santa Clara County Office of the District Attorney.
The revised budget proposes layoffs of 22 full-time employees, including 14 paralegals.
Lee emphasizes the importance of paralegals in the court system and the negative impact of their layoffs on justice and costs.
She requests the Board to support the CEO’s original recommended budget to avoid layoffs.
Limitations
The text contains unresolved placeholders such as 'To:', 'Subject:', and 'Date:', which affect the completeness of the summary.
The document appears to be a draft as it includes informal language and formatting issues.
Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.
Extracted text preview · 3,214 chars
From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: Karen Lee BoardOperations [EXTERNAL] Written Public Comment: Item No. 42 Office of the District Attorney for June 16, 2026 BOS Budget Hearing Monday, June 15, 2026 12:00:37 AM Item No. 42 Office of the District Attorney for June 16, 2026 BOS Budget Hearing.pdf Good Evening, Please see attached letter regarding item no. 42 Office of the District Attorney for June 16, 2026 BOS Budget Hearing. Please distribute to the Board of Supervisors. Respectfully, Karen Lee June 14, 2026 Dear Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors, I am writing this letter regardingitem number 42, Office of the District Attorney,on the June 16, 2026, BOS Budget Hearing Agenda. I first want to acknowledge that I recognize this budget is difficult due to significant federal funding cuts. The CEO’s original recommended budget for fiscal year 2026 to 2027, that was released in May, proposed 15 full-time employee (FTE) layoffs to the Office of the District Attorney, but the 6 attorney positions are vacant or will soon be vacant (please see snip below). Therefore, there would actually be layoffs for9 FTE’s, and all would have transfer options within...
The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.
This document contains public comments regarding the revised budget proposal by the District Attorney's Office, specifically opposing cuts to paralegal positions. Vicky Zavala, a Senior Paralegal, urges the Board to vote against the revised budget, citing concerns over public safety, court delays, overburdened staff, increased taxpayer costs, and compromised public safety. Additionally, a statement from SEIU 521 emphasizes the negative impact of budget cuts on frontline support staff and urges the Board to approve the County Executive's original budget proposal instead.
Key points
Vicky Zavala opposes the deletion of 14 filled full-time Senior/Paralegal positions in the revised budget proposal.
Zavala argues that eliminating these positions threatens public safety and the ability to prosecute offenders effectively.
The document outlines potential consequences of the budget cuts, including court delays, overburdened staff, increased taxpayer costs, and compromised public safety.
SEIU 521 also opposes the budget cuts, highlighting the importance of frontline support staff and the negative implications of reallocating their work to higher-paid positions.
Both Zavala and SEIU 521 advocate for the adoption of the original budget proposal by James Williams.
Limitations
The document contains placeholders and unfilled fields, such as the 'To' and 'Cc' sections, which may limit the completeness of the summary.
The text appears to be a draft as it includes informal language and references to attached documents without providing full context.
Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.
Extracted text preview · 8,137 chars
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Attachments: Zavala, Vicky (DAO) BoardOperations Vicky Zavala Oppose the Revised Budget Proposal - Retain Crucial Field Paralegal Positions Wednesday, June 10, 2026 1:46:56 PM Letter to Board.docm Good afternoon, Attached please find my Letter to the Board for the June 16th Budget hearing @ 1:30 pm. Sincerely, Vicky Zavala Senior Paralegal/Felony Pre-Trial Unit Office of the District Attorney Santa Clara County 70 W. Hedding St.,1st Floor/West Wing San Jose, CA 95110 vzavala@dao.sccgov.org 408-792-2804 vzavala@dao.sccgov.org County of Santa Clara Office of the District Attorney County Government Center, West Wing, 70 West Hedding Street, San Jose, California 95110 (408) 299-7400 www.santaclara-da.org Jeffrey F. Rosen District Attorney June 10, 2026 Good afternoon, Honorable Board Members, My name is Vicky Zavala, and I am a Senior Paralegal at the District Attorney’s Office. I am writing to strongly urge you to vote NO on the newly revised budget proposal and instead adopt James Williams’ original proposal. The revised budget slates 14 filled full-time Senior/Paralegal positions for deletion. At its core, this decision is deeply problematic and...
The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.
The document is a public comment addressed to the Board of Supervisors regarding the budget meeting on June 16th. It expresses support for paralegals, legal process servers, and support staff at the DAO, arguing against proposed layoffs and emphasizing the importance of maintaining current staffing levels for effective legal work. The comment criticizes the revised budget proposal for disproportionately targeting lower-paid support staff while protecting higher-paid positions, and urges the Board to adopt the original balanced budget plan proposed by the CEO.
Key points
The comment supports paralegals and support staff at the DAO.
It argues that maintaining current staffing levels is essential for handling high caseloads.
The revised budget proposal is criticized for targeting SEIU represented workers and protecting higher-paid positions.
The author believes cutting support staff will lead to productivity losses and decreased employee morale.
The comment urges the Board to adopt the original balanced budget plan proposed by the CEO.
Limitations
The document appears to be a draft as it includes placeholders for sender and recipient details.
The date mentioned is June 15, 2026, which may not be relevant or accurate.
Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.
Extracted text preview · 3,176 chars
From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: Dominique Rizzi BoardOperations [EXTERNAL] DAO Revised Proposal Monday, June 15, 2026 2:31:16 PM Board Members.docx Please see attached letter to the Board of Supervisors for the June 16th Budget Meeting. Hello Board Members, I am writing in support of our dedicated and hard-working paralegals, legal process servers, and support staff here at the DAO. Paralegals and support staff are a fiscally responsible way to ensure that a single attorney can take on a high caseload which is required of attorneys at the DAO. A balanced budget keeps paralegals and support staff at their current numbers so that our office can secure convictions of violent offenders and violent crimes, which is what keeps our community safe. Expecting other support staff and attorneys to pick up the workload of 11 full-time paralegals, is both short-sited and unrealistic. We already have the second highest ratio of attorneys to paralegals in the state, cutting 11 full time paralegals would then make us the highest ratio in the state. If you were to ask any of our attorneys, they would assure you that they cannot do what we do. The help that we provide to our attorneys allows...